ECCV 2026

SeGroS: Enhancing Alignment for Unified Multimodal Models via Semantically-Grounded Supervision

1Ewha Womans University, South Korea, 2Soongsil University, South Korea

†Corresponding author

Text-to-image generation examples from SeGroS on Harmon 1.5B.

Abstract

Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm that integrates multimodal understanding and generation within a unified modeling framework. However, current generative training paradigms suffer from inherent limitations. We present Semantically-Grounded Supervision (SeGroS), a fine-tuning framework designed to resolve the granularity mismatch and supervisory redundancy in UMMs. At its core, we propose a novel visual grounding map to construct two complementary supervision signals. First, we formulate semantic Visual Hints to compensate for the sparsity of text prompts. Second, we generate a semantically-grounded Corrupted Input to explicitly enhance the supervision of masking-based UMMs by restricting the reconstruction loss to core text-aligned regions. Extensive evaluations on GenEval, DPGBench, and CompBench demonstrate that SeGroS significantly improves generation fidelity and cross-modal alignment across various UMM architectures.

Why Semantically-Grounded Supervision?

Sparse text prompts leave fine-grained visual details unspecified, while dense image prompts can introduce redundant information. SeGroS grounds supervision in text-aligned image regions to provide informative visual hints and focus reconstruction on semantically relevant targets.

Comparison of text-only, image-only, and SeGroS supervision.

Method

SeGroS framework and discriminative text-token filtering.

SeGroS combines intra-modal and inter-modal text affinities to identify discriminative text tokens and construct a visual grounding map. High-scoring image regions provide visual hints, while low-scoring regions remain visible in the corrupted input so reconstruction focuses on text-aligned targets.

Visual Hints and Semantically-Grounded Corrupted Input
Visualization of semantic grounding, visual hints, and corrupted input.

Results

Qualitative results and quantitative evaluation.

Text-to-Image Generation
Text-to-image generation comparison between Reca and SeGroS on OpenUni 3.6B.

Quantitative Evaluation

Text-to-image generation results from Table 1. Higher is better for all metrics.

Text-to-image generation across unified multimodal models
ModelMethodGenEval ↑DPG-Bench ↑CompBench ↑
SingleTwoCountColorPositionAttr.OverallOverallOverall
Fine-tuning dataset: MidjourneyV6
Show-o-256w/o SFT97.463.352.182.314.230.356.670.6573.58
Show-o-256SFT*97.863.453.480.316.533.557.574.675.37
Show-o-256Reca97.473.656.083.820.340.261.975.777.5*
Show-o-256Ours98.172.554.486.421.041.062.2276.5278.30
Show-o-512w/o SFT97.280.361.978.227.352.366.282.2180.53
Show-o-512SFT*97.284.166.680.926.846.867.0381.880.02
Show-o-512Reca98.193.464.779.838.055.871.63*84.9484.47
Show-o-512Ours97.891.465.081.935.053.070.6985.1884.35
OpenUni-1.6Bw/o SFT96.863.346.480.118.530.856.076.2975.47
OpenUni-1.6BSFT*97.876.855.981.925.536.062.3279.781.25
OpenUni-1.6BReca96.685.452.584.346.550.869.33*80.4583.1*
OpenUni-1.6BOurs98.884.656.984.038.854.069.581.3383.83
OpenUni-3.6Bw/o SFT99.171.851.983.923.341.661.979.0278.84
OpenUni-3.6BSFT*98.881.355.985.925.048.865.9480.4582.6
OpenUni-3.6BReca99.192.752.387.143.870.374.182.7586.0*
OpenUni-3.6BOurs99.795.252.585.146.873.075.3783.3786.14
Harmon-0.5Bw/o SFT99.780.555.886.732.249.767.680.1280.34
Harmon-0.5BSFT*10086.464.487.537.856.572.182.583.5
Harmon-0.5BReca99.992.359.491.758.570.778.784.6785.7*
Harmon-0.5BOurs10090.265.391.566.075.881.585.486.9
Fine-tuning dataset: BLIP3o-60k
Harmon-1.5Bw/o SFT99.487.368.786.444.951.172.980.9381.36
Harmon-1.5BSFT*99.194.777.886.478.374.085.085.687.32
Harmon-1.5BReca——————85.286.587.2*
Harmon-1.5BOurs10097.779.190.483.581.388.6686.5888.08

* Results reproduced using the official implementations. Bold indicates the best score within each backbone. Shaded rows indicate SeGroS (Ours).

Visual Understanding

Harmon-1.5B fine-tuned on BLIP3o-60k. Results from Table 2; higher is better.

Visual understanding performance
MethodMMEPOPE (Acc)POPE (F1)GQAMMMUSEED
w/o SFT119583.883.958.834.765.2
SFT121084.084.158.535.365.1
Reca119083.983.458.534.965.1
Ours121784.584.258.736.065.5

BibTeX

@inproceedings{kim2026enhancing,
  title        = {Enhancing Alignment for Unified Multimodal Models via Semantically-Grounded Supervision},
  author       = {Kim, Jiyeong and So, Yerim and Choi, Hyesong and Hwang, Uiwon and Min, Dongbo},
  booktitle    = {European Conference on Computer Vision},
  pages        = {634--651},
  year         = {2026},
  organization = {Springer}
}